'Clear out' clarification pls !
Author |
Message |
deludedgenius
World XV Player
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:27 am Posts: 42127
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
http://www.irblaws.com/index.php?law=16&language=ENI'd say Bakkies was in violation of 16.2 a and b, and 16.3 a. But I agree he was in line with the normal interpretations, even if they are against the laws of the game. In the same way the hit in the scrum is also technically illegal but tolerated.
_________________ You can't create honey out of dog shit - some random Cannuck
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ
|
Tue Jun 11, 2013 9:53 pm |
|
 |
Blindside
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:39 am Posts: 11909 Location: Neath Valley
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Yes .... cant disagree, the argument could be made for all three. Watch the technique used to enter the ruck towards the end of this little trailer.... it is not described in full, but entering under the other player as low as possible and not binding is clear in what they are trying to achieve. http://www.therugbysite.com/videos/27-c ... out-attack
_________________ "Business!' cried the Ghost, wringing its hands again. "Mankind was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business. The deals of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!” “None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free.” "The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for
|
Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:12 pm |
|
 |
deludedgenius
World XV Player
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:27 am Posts: 42127
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Its what they want to do to get an advantage, but contravenes several laws and is generally not punished
_________________ You can't create honey out of dog shit - some random Cannuck
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ
|
Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:23 pm |
|
 |
deludedgenius
World XV Player
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:27 am Posts: 42127
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
The video doesn't bloody work on my tablet, will have to have a look on my laptop tomorrow
_________________ You can't create honey out of dog shit - some random Cannuck
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ
|
Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:24 pm |
|
 |
Blindside
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:39 am Posts: 11909 Location: Neath Valley
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Great link to the irb laws... you can register and test yourself on the laws of the game in minutes 
_________________ "Business!' cried the Ghost, wringing its hands again. "Mankind was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business. The deals of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!” “None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free.” "The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for
|
Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:37 pm |
|
 |
Bouch
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:24 pm Posts: 45278 Location: Llanharan
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
http://www.irblaws.com/index.php?law=16&language=ENOne for the "favourites", right enough. Yet another Login though.
|
Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:29 am |
|
 |
Chris ScumV
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 57631 Location: Sunny Resolven
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
looking at it in slo-mo there are no SA players on their feet, so technically it could even be argued that the ruck was over and we had moved to the xet pahse of play, which opens up a shed load of other offences and penalties.
What it DOES go to prove is what a top international ref said to me a year or so ago, that being "if refs penalised every offence at the breakdown then every breakdown would end in a penalty".
The law states a player must bind before or simultaneously driving. if there are no players on their feet then how can there be a ruck?
16.2 Joining a ruck (a) All players forming, joining or taking part in a ruck must have their heads and shoulders no lower than their hips. Sanction: Free Kick
(b) A player joining a ruck must bind on a team-mate or an opponent, using the whole arm. The bind must either precede, or be simultaneous with, contact with any other part of the body of the player joining the ruck. Sanction: Penalty kick
(c) Placing a hand on another player in the ruck does not constitute binding. Sanction: Penalty kick
(d) All players forming, joining or taking part in a ruck must be on their feet.
_________________ OSPREYS REGIONAL RUGBY - The One true region - SOUTH West is best Boys Butti Innit
Internet Marketing Consultancy - SEO Agony Uncle
|
Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:53 pm |
|
 |
guest
World XV Player
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 4:08 pm Posts: 13219
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
First,..thks guys for the edifying input and broadened context.
Yes the todays breakdown is riddled with offences that refs could blow for.
I believe that the ref has 'powers' to decided on the effect on the course of the game and can sensibly waive the offence?
I believe that the blatancy of the offence and the dangerous nature of it is important and that's why I raised the 'compound' offence of ... not entering by the back door, not binding on, going offiside, tackling a man without the ball or not truly within the ruck and finally lazy return and hampering the opponents use of the ball ...and is dangerous ...That's a list of crimes that deserves more than a blind eye (I refer to the lone runner who targets a member of the opponent who is isolated, often uses the shoulder etc etc and commits all these fouls).
Finally the breakdown personifies how lax reffing can become 'norm' and compounded when multiple laws apply.
I can't defend the other end of the spectrum,.... the simple offence of not putting the ball in straight in the scrum which is not penalised either and is just a simple example of the reffing malaise ; leave alone N and S Hemp different general interpretation and application.
It's a mess in general.
Rant over ..
_________________
Easy to consider past and present, it's the future and associated plan and strategy to achieve that takes the talent ...
|
Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:20 pm |
|
 |
Chris ScumV
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 57631 Location: Sunny Resolven
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Deserved rant though, I agree with it all pretty much. but by god it is a hard job reffing a match 
_________________ OSPREYS REGIONAL RUGBY - The One true region - SOUTH West is best Boys Butti Innit
Internet Marketing Consultancy - SEO Agony Uncle
|
Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
 |
guest
World XV Player
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 4:08 pm Posts: 13219
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
In my experience U 8s were the worst to ref ... just one big bloody breakdown !  .. or maybe 'swarm' is a better description...
_________________
Easy to consider past and present, it's the future and associated plan and strategy to achieve that takes the talent ...
|
Wed Jun 12, 2013 9:25 pm |
|
 |
Bouch
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:24 pm Posts: 45278 Location: Llanharan
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Cluster?
|
Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:04 am |
|
 |
Chris ScumV
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 57631 Location: Sunny Resolven
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
Blanket rugby, where you can throw a blanket over the ball and cover all the players on the pitch 
_________________ OSPREYS REGIONAL RUGBY - The One true region - SOUTH West is best Boys Butti Innit
Internet Marketing Consultancy - SEO Agony Uncle
|
Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:59 am |
|
 |
Bouch
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:24 pm Posts: 45278 Location: Llanharan
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
|
Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:32 pm |
|
 |
String
World XV Player
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:54 pm Posts: 22862 Location: Cayman Islands
|
 Re: 'Clear out' clarification pls !
NZ do this battering ram constantly - far more than most sides. Its dangerous, it's illegal, it's always been illegal but yet again is an example of referees refusing to implement the laws of the game.
At BEST its a penalty offence for off the feet. At worse levels its a card for dangerous play/shoulder charging.
_________________ 'It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so *fupping* what?' —Stephen Fry
"You like PhillBB demand facts for debate........My premise needs no facts to debate it" - Rosario on "how to look like an idiot"
http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitcomberd/
|
Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:23 am |
|
|