It is currently Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:49 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Rugby Australia want a few major tweaks 
Author Message
World XV Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:34 am
Posts: 15042
Location: Japan
Post Re: Rugby Australia want a few major tweaks
deludedgenius wrote:
Its an interesting idea and could be fun to watch, a bit like T20 cricket.

If you're going to have a fast paced short games, then maybe it would be worth having less than 15 a side, maybe 10 or 13?

I think its a pretty good idea, I'd leave it at 15 a side though, so it isn't a new breakaway sport.

_________________
Religion is like a penis.
It's fine to have one, and fine to be proud of it.
But please don't whip it out in public and start waving it around,
And PLEASE don't try to shove it down my child's throat.


Tue May 14, 2013 5:22 am
Profile
Regional Junior Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 10:13 pm
Posts: 158
Post Re: Rugby Australia want a few major tweaks
Bouch wrote:
READ THE PREAMBLE.

http://www.espnscrum.com/scrum/rugby/story/182286.html

Pulver says the concept will allow Australia's Super Rugby franchises each to expand their playing roster to "45 or 50" players, as has been requested by team coaches and management, and matches would be played as curtain raisers ahead of Super Rugby derby fixtures.

"What this would do is that you use the infrastructure of the Super Rugby franchises," Pulver told ESPNscrum. "The grounds are already paid for. They are actually paid for from 5pm, when you open the gates. So no more costs there. Most of the Super Rugby franchises have already got four coaches. And you'd only have two travel teams each week. Travel is probably going to be the most significant cost. Player payments will have to be managed carefully."

The radical part of Pulver's proposal is his concept of "a one-hour game of rugby" featuring two specific law changes "designed at creating a frenetic-paced game based around smart running rugby".

"You can't have a 40-10-40-minute footy game as a curtain raiser and expect people to turn up at 5pm. They won't. They never have. We want to create an environment, which on the one hand exposes young talent to the Australian rugby public; and maybe do that through a draft, so you distribute that talent around the franchises, but it also focuses its energies on displaying smart, creative rugby. It is a case of where we have listened to the complaints about stoppages, and the frustration of the game. So here's a unique brand of the game where we kick off at 6pm and be over by 7pm.

"In the ideal world I would love two rule changes, and I have to work through this with the IRB. It would be 25-minute halves, no penalty goals, and five-minute yellow cards for infringements in your own half. The yellow card will be a bit like water polo; the rule I love in water polo is that if you infringe when they are attacking your goal, you are out of the pool until they score. Great rule. Our equivalent would be, in a 25-minute game; an infringing player is off the field for five minutes or until the opposition scores."

Pulver says broadcast executives have shown "interest in it" as "we look to relaunch rugby" in Australia, but he does accept that his proposal has a number of obstacles to cross even apart from the IRB's involvement in the suggested law changes.

"The tricky bit is that you don't want to … kill Premier Rugby," Pulver said of Australia's club rugby scene. "So we are looking at positioning this at the front end of the Super Rugby competition and that it complements club rugby, while potentially linking into Sevens programs. Club rugby starts in April. We might defer club rugby, so that it starts in May - and have this development competition going through until May. Then the players would go to club rugby."

Pulver also accepts that "there must be a concern that if you are using this as a developmental process, what is the point of them playing a different game?"

"We are trying to satisfy multiple objectives here," he said. "The public is frustrated with stoppages in the game, so this is a very obvious attempt to show an effect to address that. It is also teaching the kids the skills required to play smart, creative rugby running. You'll have scrums, lineouts, and you are basically preparing them for Super Rugby, but there are a couple of compromises, which will add some excitement to the game."

Why do the Aussies and Kiwi's always have to run to the IRB and ask them to change the rules when SA comes up with a new way of playing the game? After the clever 2007 tweaks which had no advantage for any team but NZ and Aus and it did not effect them at all. Great way to get rugby global by favoring a already 5 team dominated sport


Wed May 29, 2013 7:00 pm
Profile E-mail
World XV Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:34 am
Posts: 15042
Location: Japan
Post Re: Rugby Australia want a few major tweaks
You've lost me, what rules are they wanting to change? Kiwis and cons that is.

_________________
Religion is like a penis.
It's fine to have one, and fine to be proud of it.
But please don't whip it out in public and start waving it around,
And PLEASE don't try to shove it down my child's throat.


Thu May 30, 2013 5:24 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: